Brief considerations on research Methodology for novice researchers
Main Article Content
Abstract
Traditionally, research, as a scientific endeavor, has been considered as an exclusive activity for elite academic groups; nevertheless, the current demands of society and Academia have brought about a greater need for developing scientific studies and reporting on them in academic publications. Faced with this reality, students and professionals of all fields of knowledge, including, of course, Education, have turned toward the development of scientific research processes. For this reason, this article offers basic notions regarding Research Methodology, in an attempt to motivate those individuals who are taking their first steps in this field. The paragraphs to follow provide a brief introduction to the topic, and succinct analysis of the diverse research methods and the components of these processes, namely: participants; data gathering, analysis, exploration, and representation; as well as, interpretation and validation of results.
Downloads
Article Details
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in the INNOVA Research Journal keeps copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work under the Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: a) the authorship and original source of their publication (magazine, publisher, URL and DOI of the work) is cited; b) are not used for commercial purposes; c) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Bernal, C. (2013). Metodología de la Investigación (4ta ed.). Bogotá: Pearson Educación de Colombia.
Bloor, M. (2016). Addressing social problems through qualitative research. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research (pp 15 –30). London: Sage Publications.
Brown, J. (1988). Understanding Research in Second Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, J. (2001). Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Brown, J.(2014). Mixed Methods Research for TESOL. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Creswell, J. (2007).Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among fiveApproaches (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Method Research (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Davies, K. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research.TESOL Quarterly 2 (29):427-453.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etikan, I., Abubakar, S., & Sunusi, R. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
Erzberger, C. & Kelle, U. (2003). Making inferences in mixed methods: the rules of Integration.In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research (pp. 457 –488). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.
Flick, V. (2014). La gestión de la calidad en la Investigación Cualitativa.Madrid: Morata.
Garrat, D. & Li, Y. (2005). The foundations of experimental/empirical research methods. InB. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research Methods in the Social Sciences (pp 198 –206). London: Sage.
Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The Research Manual: Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. New York: Newbury House.
Gheitasi, P. & Lindgren, E. (2015). Broadening the understanding of the language classroom: Mixed Methods. In Lindgren, E. & Enever, J. (Eds.), Språkdidaktik: Researching Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 21 –30). Umeå: Umeå University.
Johnson, R. & Christensen, L. (2004).Education Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, andMixed Approaches (2nded.)Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Lazaraton, A. (2005). Quantitative Research Methods. In E. Hinkel (Ed.),Handbook ofResearch in Second Language Teaching and Learning(pp. 209 –224).Mawah, NJ: Laurence Erlbau.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Mackey, A. & Gass, S. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
McKay, S. (2006). Researching Second Language Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.
Mertens, D. (2005). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods (2nded.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller, W. & Crabtree, F. (1999). Depth interviewing. In B.F. Crabtree and W.L. Miller (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research (pp. 89 –107). London: Sage.
Miller, J. & Glassner, B. (2016). The ‘inside’ and the ‘outside’: Finding realities in interviews. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative Research (pp 51 –66). London: Sage Publications.
Onwuegbuzie, A. & Leech, N. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher:The Importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8 (5): 575-587.
Sánchez Gómez, M. (2015). La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativa: posibilidades deintegración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto, 11 –30.
Sandelowsky, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddie (Eds.), Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research(pp. 321 –350). Thosand Oaks, CA. Sage.
Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A guide for Researches in Education and the Social Sciences (2nded.).New York: Teachers College Press.
Schwandt, T. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry. In N.K.
Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nded.) (pp. 189 –213). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.