La acción tutorial: Análisis de la dinámica intelectual desde la praxis universitaria
Main Article Content
Abstract
Post-graduate studies have been increasing in recent years, both in quantity offered and in the number of participants enrolled in them, however the number of graduates do not correspond to the number of enrolled. Many culminate their academic charges, but do not fulfill with the presentation of the Title Work requirement for obtaining the nomination, so the intellectual production still does not respond to the expectations that the market and society require. Up to now the different investigations in this regard try to focus the problem towards very specific areas, however the thought processes or the intellectual dynamics that come into play do not seem to have aroused concerns for their investigation, hence the present investigation aimed to identify those processes that are implicit during the development of the tutorial praxis, for it, it was framed within a mixed approach, where the quantitative was framed in a descriptive type research, with no experimental design. The population was conformed by 18 teachers with function as a tutor. The information was obtained through a Lickert-type survey. The qualitative approach allowed the researchers a direct approach with their object of study that is Intellectual Dynamics. The information was obtained through interviews with key informants. The use of different strategies: summaries, under lining, questioning, among others were evidenced as a strategy of regular use among them. In the same way, the tutorial Praxis requires different ways of thinking for the scientific approach in the scriptural and linguistic development. The results show the importance of affective emotional management in the commitment that both the tutor and the tutee must establish, since this is what allows the intellectual dynamics to flow and the successful development of the tutorial management
Keywords: Intellectual Dynamics, Praxis Tutorial, Emotional Intelligence, Postgraduate
Downloads
Article Details
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Authors who publish in the INNOVA Research Journal keeps copyright and guarantee the journal the right to be the first publication of the work under the Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted and publicly exhibited, provided that: a) the authorship and original source of their publication (magazine, publisher, URL and DOI of the work) is cited; b) are not used for commercial purposes; c) the existence and specifications of this license of use are mentioned.
References
Arias, F. (1999). El Proyecto de Investigación. Una Guía para su Elaboración. (2a. Ed.). Caracas: Episteme.
Balestrini, M. (1997). Como Elaborar un Proyecto de Investigación. Caracas: Consultores asociados.
Calvo, F. (2001). Estadística Aplicada. Barcelona: Deudos.
Canales, E (S/F). El Perfil del Tutor Académico. (Documento en línea). Recuperado de http://papyt.xa,vam.mx/media/bhem/dues/pdf/116pdf.
Fernández, S. y Cols (1997) Cultura, Inteligencia emocional percibida y ajuste emocional. Un estudio preliminar. Revista electrónica de motivación y emoción. 4, 8-9. Recuperado de http://reme.uji.es/articulos/afernp9912112101/texto.html.
Gutiérrez, L. (S/F). Paradigmas Cuantitativo y Cualitativa en la Investigación Socio educativa. Proyecciones y reflexiones. Revista Paradigma. Recuperado de http://www.revistaparadigma.org.ve/Doc./Paradigma96/doc/htm.
Hernández, R., Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2008). Metodología de la Investigación. (4a. Ed.).Ciudad de México: McGraw-Hill.
Hurtado, D. (2008) La Configuración: Un recurso para comprender los entramados de las significaciones imaginarias. (Documento en línea). Recuperado dehttp://www.unizales.edu.co/revistacinde/index.htlm.
Martínez, M. (2014). Comportamiento Humano. (2ª. Ed.) México: Trillas.
Mateo M. (2001). Metacognición y Educación. Buenos Aires: Aique. Morles, V. (2004). La educación de postgrado en Venezuela. Panorama y perspectiva. IESALC –UNESCO. Caracas: Monte de Ávila.
Neisser, U. (1981). Procesos Cognitivos y Realidad. Madrid: Marova.
Poggioli, L (S/F). Aprender a enseñar y aprender a aprender. (Documento en línea). Recuperado de http://www.fpolar.org.ve/poggioli/poggprof/.htm.
Palella y Martins (2008). Metodología de la Investigación Cuantitativa. Venezuela: Fondoupel.
Ruiz, C. (2002). Instrumentos de Investigación Educativa. Venezuela: Cideg.
Ruiz, J. (1998). Dirección de los procesos educativos. .Universidad de Pinar del Río. (Documento en línea). Recuperado de http://www.monografias.com/trabajos40/liderazgo-delprofesor/liderazgo-delprofesor2.shtml.
Tamayo y Tamayo (2007). El Proceso de la Investigación Científica. (6a ed). México, DF. Limusa.
Valarino, E. (2012). Tesis a Tiempo. Barcelona, España: Grupo E,Capitulo 4: El Director es muy Importante. Pp. 129-132.