Development of local clusters and global value chains:Diagnosis, theoretical review and methodological justification of the encadena program evaluation Ecuador

Main Article Content

Daniel Disyorque Peñaherrera Patiño

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical review and the methodological justification for the evaluation of the development program of local clusters (CL) and value chains (CV) called Encadena-Ecuador in the period between 2007-2017. In this period, a public program aimed at the productive development of the intermediate industry was implemented with the purpose of generating favorable conditions for the insertion of the CL and the CVs to the so-called global value chains (CVG) as a strategy to boost growth and growth. economic development of the countries. The objective of the work is to present the justification and relevance of the evaluation methodology implemented for the aforementioned program, in order to be able to analyze technically the advantages and disadvantages of the methodology used by the public institution in charge of said program. For the development of the work, an exploratory research methodology based on the review of the literature specialized in the subject has been used, focusing on presenting results on the importance of the study of the impact evaluation of the productive development programs of CL and CV. The main conclusion is that the productive development program Encadena-Ecuador, used a type of incompatible and insufficient evaluation with the profile and potential of the program, since a process evaluation was determined, when technically, it was convenient to apply an evaluation methodology of impact, in order to determine a causal effect in the program.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Peñaherrera Patiño, D. D. (2018). Development of local clusters and global value chains:Diagnosis, theoretical review and methodological justification of the encadena program evaluation Ecuador. INNOVA Reseach Journal, 3(8.1), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v3.n8.1.2018.788
Section
Anticles
Author Biography

Daniel Disyorque Peñaherrera Patiño, Universidad de Guayaquil, Ecuador

Profesor-investigador titular de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad de Guayaquil -Ecuador-, Doctorando en Ciencias Económicas, Empresariales y Sociales de la Universidad de Sevilla -España-, MBA con Especialidad en Economía Aplicada, Política Económica, Política Industrial y Empresarial de la Universidad Andrés Bello de Chile.

References

Becattini, G. (1979) Dal settore industriale al distretto industriale. Alcune considerazioni sull’unita` di indagine dell’economia industriale, Rivistadi Economía e Política Industriale, 5(1), pp. 7–21.

Becattini, G. (1990) The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion, in: F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (eds) Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy (Geneva, Switzerland: International Institute for Labour Studies), pp. 51-65.

Crespi, G., Maffioli, A. & Rasteletti, A. (2014). Investing in ideas: policies to foster innovation, in G. Crespi, E. Fernández-Arias & E. Stein (Eds.), Rethinking productive development: sound policies and institutions for economic transformation (pp. 61-106). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Dunning, J. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: a restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 1-31.

Dunning, J. (2000). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 163-190.

Gereffi, G. (1999). “International Trade and Industrial Upgrading in the Apparel Commodity Chain”, Journal of International Economics, vol. 48, pp. 37-70.

Gertler P, & Martínez S, Premand P, Rawlings L, Vermeersch C (2011). La evaluación de impacto en la práctica, Banco Internacional de Reconstrucción y Fomento/Banco Mundial 1818 H Street NW Washington DC 20433. pp. 3-7.

Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey and T. Sturgeon (2005). “The governance of global value chains”, Review of International Political Economy, vol. 12, num. 1, pp. 78-104.

Gonçalves, Días Carcanholo, Filgueiras & Costa Pinto (2008) Los condicionantes de la crisis en América Latina. Inserción internacional y modalidades de acumulación. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, ISBN 978-987-1543-17-5. Pag-119-138.

Herrera M (2009) La evaluación de impacto y la evaluación de proceso en un sistema general de evaluación. Introducción al tema mediante un estudio de caso: el programa tortilla. Cuadernos de Economía, 28(51), 2009.

Jaffe, A. B. (1996). Economic analysis of research spillovers: Implications for the advanced technology program. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Report GCR 97-708.

Kogut, B. (1984). Normative Observations on the International Value-Added Chain and Strategic Groups. Journal of International Business Studies, 151-167.

Kogut, B. (1985). Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value Added Chains. Sloan Management Review, 15-28.

Maffioli, A., Pietrobelli, C. & Stucchi, R. (2016).The impact evaluation of cluster development programs: Methods and practice. Forthcoming, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington DC.

Marshall, A. (1920) Principles of Economics, rev.ed. (London: Macmillan, reprinted by Prometheus Books, 1st edn., 1890).

Maskell, P. (2001) Towards a knowledge-based theory of the geographical cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, pp. 919–941.

Morrison, A., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2008). Global Value Chains and Technological Capabilities: A Framework to Study Learning and Innovation in Developing Countries. Revista Oxford Development Studies, 36-58.

Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, Control and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 699-725.

Narula, R., & Dunning, J. (2000). Industrial Development, Globalization and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries. Oxford Development Studies, 142-166.

Oakey, R., Kipling, M. & Wildgust, S. (2001) Clustering among firms in the non-broadcast visual communications (NBVC) sector, Regional Studies, 35, pp. 401–414.

Peres, W (2005) El (lento) retorno de las políticas industriales en América Latina y el Caribe. NU. CEPAL. División de Desarrollo Productivo y Empresarial. Serie Desarrollo Productivo No. 166 -37 p.

Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and sustaininga superior performance. New York: Free Press.

Porter, M.E. (1990) the Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

Romero I & Santos F (2006). Encadenamientos productivos, externalidades y crecimiento regional Una tipología de comportamiento empresarial. Boletín económico de ICE n° 2872, 2006. 40-61.

Romero I. (2009). Pymes y cadenas de valor globales. Implicaciones para la política industrial en las economías en desarrollo. Análisis Económico Núm. 57, vol. XXIV Tercer cuatrimestre de 2009. Págs. 199-216.

Ruelas-Gossi, A & Donald N. Sull (2006), Orquestación estratégica la clave para la agilidad en el escenario global. Harvard Business Review, ISSN 0717-9952, Vol. 84, Nº. 11, 2006, págs. 42-52.

Ruelas-Gossi, A (2011), Mexico’s Maquiladora Syndrome. Harvard Business Review, ISSN 0717-9952, Vol. 89, Nº. 1, 2011, págs. 2-3.

Steinle C. & Schiele H. (2002) when do industries cluster? A proposal on how to access an industry’s propensity to concentrate in a single region or nation, Research Policy, 31, pp. 849–858.

Solow, R. (1956). A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economic, 65-94.

Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N. & Pinch, S. (2004) Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage, Academy of Management Review, 29, pp. 258–271.

Van Klink, A. & De Langen, P. (2001) Cycles in industrial clusters: the case of the shipbuilding industry in the northern Netherlands, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 92, pp. 449–463.