INNOVA Research Journal 2016, Vol 1, No. 2, pp. 10-27
The World Bank’s strategic priorities in education focus on strengthening education systems and
building a high-quality knowledge base in order to promote learning and facilitate economic
growth (World Bank, 2011b). Similar to the LMTF, the World Bank also redefined the concept
of education and loosely defined the “education system” to include all learning opportunities
within a society regardless of whether it is formal or non-formal (World Bank, 2011b).
Loosening the definition of an education system expands the role of accountability within the
World Bank’s strategic education framework by making all agents involved partners in sharing
the goal of promoting learning. In contrast, the World Bank plans to leverage its expertise and
focus on the generation and exchange of knowledge, and by providing technical and financial
support, they hope to establish strategic partnerships to assist education systems in cultivating a
learning environment (World Bank, 2001b).
While the World Bank’s Learning for All emphasize the need for quality life-long
learning experiences and the need for an effective measurement system, many critics question
whether the approach taken by the World Bank and other aid agencies in promoting “learning for
all” is in fact global consensus and not a rebranding of old World Bank ideas under the guise of
global partnership. Steiner-Khamsi (2012) reviews the Learning for All strategy formulation
lifecycle into a Development, Review, Approval, and Presentation phase (see Figure 2), and
questions whether the strategic plan is actually a collaborative effect, as she demonstrates that
the two most important phases where decisions are actually made, Development and Approval,
take place internally at the World Bank leading to what she calls “rhetorical harmonization”.
This lack of insight into the decision and agenda setting process is compounded by the fact the
World Bank serves as the reviewer, implementer, and evaluator of their own projects and often
time disseminating a solution with minor adaptations to reduce the transaction costs (Steiner-
Khamsi, 2012). In addition, by viewing the World Bank as a social system with a set of clearly
mandates and seeing its transformation from solely a lender to a “super think tank” that also
lends knowledge and technical assistance to recipient governments, it becomes evident that the
World Bank, as a generator of knowledge, has positioned itself in the center of the international
educational development discourse (Steiner-Khamsi, 2012). Furthermore, some critics argue that
the loosening of the “education system” definition permits multilateral aid organizations, like the
World Bank, to advance its agenda and infiltrate into the local policy conversation (Steiner-
Khamsi, 2012). Moreover, the trend in recent years has been for multilateral aid organizations to
converge and endorse the same international agreements, such as EFA and MDG, which use to
measurable student outcomes as the main gauge of effectiveness, resulting in an environment
where a few dominant multilateral aid organizations set the international educational
development agenda (Gita Steiner-Khamsi, 2012).
Also absent in the global framework that emphasizes learning through set of
contextneutral competencies, is the acknowledgement that each country poses a unique context-
specific challenge that might not fit into the new paradigm, and if overlooked may essentially
hinder the development process. At times, teacher policies and agenda set forth by the World
Bank in Washington, DC are in conflict with the research being done in the field, hindering their
effectiveness as was evident in teacher accountability funded project in Mongolia (Steiner-
Khamsi, 2012). Specific to Haiti, the World Bank’s EFA Phase II Initiative has funded the
Accelerated Pre-service Teacher Education Reform (Programme de Formation Initiale
Accelerée, FIA) in efforts to increase the supply of teachers, build institutional capacity, and to
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/
22