ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL  
INNOVA Research Journal, ISSN 2477-9024  
Septiembre-Diciembre 2023). Vol. 8, No.3 pp. 51-70  
(
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review  
from the theory of planned behavior between 2008 and 2022  
Comportamiento de desarrollo productivo rural y agrícola. Una revisión de  
literatura desde la teoría del comportamiento planificado entre 2008 y 2022  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril  
Fundación Universitaria Católica Lumen Gentium, Cali, Colombia  
Nicolás Aragón-Sánchez  
Fundación Universitaria Católica Lumen Gentium, Cali, Colombia  
José Julián Ríos-Chávez  
Fundación Universitaria Católica Lumen Gentium, Cali, Colombia  
Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
Fundación Universitaria Católica Lumen Gentium, Cali, Colombia  
Recepción: 23/06/2023 | Aceptación: 24/08/2023 | Publicación: 10/09/2023  
Cómo citar (APA, séptima edición):  
Ordoñez-Abril, D. Y., Aragón-Sánchez, N., Ríos-Chávez, J. J., & Rodríguez-Porto, R. (2023).  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of  
planned behavior between 2008 and 2022. INNOVA Research Journal, 8(3), 51-70.  
https://doi.org/10.33890/innova.v8.n3.2023.2306  
Abstract  
The different studies on behavior and decision-making in rural, agro-industrial, territorial, and  
development projects have gained importance in recent years, mainly due to the need to understand  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Common Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
51  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
and comprehend those factors of human behavior that affect productive rural development. A  
systematic review of the literature on planned behavior in rural and agricultural project  
development between 2008 and 2022 was carried out. The work was carried out by consulting  
scientific and academic databases such as ScienceDirect, ISI - Web of Science, Springer, Scielo,  
Emerald, and Scopus, completing the process with content analysis and systematization of articles  
in NVivo software. Three significant clusters of studies focused on development behavior, rural  
behavior, and productive development were identified. It was concluded that behavioral studies  
and their different analysis methods in the rural and agricultural fields aim to improve standard  
practices through participatory methodological proposals, which reflect on social behavior and the  
adoption and implementation of practical agricultural development models.  
Keywords: economic performance; rural development; development projects.  
Resumen  
Los diferentes estudios sobre el comportamiento y la toma de decisiones en proyectos rurales,  
agroindustriales, territoriales y de desarrollo han tomado importancia en los últimos años,  
principalmente, por la necesidad de entender y comprender aquellos factores de la conducta  
humana que inciden en el desarrollo productivo rural. Se realizó un repaso sistemático de la  
literatura sobre el comportamiento planeado en el marco del desarrollo de proyectos rurales y  
agrícolas entre los años 2008 y 2022. El trabajo se realizó a través de la consulta de bases de datos  
científicas y académicas como ScienceDirect, ISI  Web of Science, Springer, Scielo, Emerald y  
Scopus, completando el proceso con análisis de contenido y sistematización de artículos en el  
software NVivo. Identificando tres grandes conglomerados de estudios enfocados en el  
comportamiento de desarrollo, comportamiento rural y desarrollo productivo. Concluyéndose que  
los estudios comportamentales y sus diferentes métodos de análisis, en el ámbito rural y agrícola  
pretenden mejorar las prácticas comunes por medio de propuestas metodológicas participativas,  
que lleven a reflexionar sobre el comportamiento social y la adopción e implementación de  
modelos de desarrollo agrícolas prácticos.  
Palabras claves: comportamiento económico; desarrollo rural; proyectos de desarrollo.  
Introduction  
The different studies on behavior and decision-making in rural, agro-industrial, territorial,  
and development projects have become very important in recent years, mainly because of the need  
to account for and understand those factors of human behavior that affect productive rural  
development. In this scenario, researchers have focused on the optimal selection of alternatives,  
understood as the product of a complex set of stimuli and emotions directed to a given action  
(Ordoñez et al., 2021), which seeks the success of projects and rural progress (Palacios & Estrada,  
2
020). In other words, the aim is to understand how farmers can adapt effectively to ensure their  
growth and well-being over time.  
Thus, the study incorporated ethical approaches, which imply an approach based on the  
theory of planned behavior (Ajzen, 1991), and to give another look at those factors of the  
productive units in rural areas, which in favor of their development affect the intention to act  
(Nettle et al., 2021; Nguyen et al., 2021; Pérez & Egea, 2019; Ranjbar et al., 2021; Rezaei et al.,  
2
020; Rezaei et al., 2018; Sarkar et al., 2022; Was et al., 2021). Now, in this rural context, the  
behavior has been directly associated with the decision to elaborate works for the implementation  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
52  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
of new telecommunication technologies (ICT) and to execute agricultural projects that contribute  
to the improvement of standard practices that include training for the strengthening of interactive  
learning (Fang et al., 2021; Kaufmann et al., 2009; Landmann et al., 2020; Mwalupaso et al., 2019;  
Omulo & Kumeh, 2020). However, this issue has also been addressed in the social sphere, where  
behavioral aspects begin with the adoption and implementation of flexible agricultural  
development models that guarantee the improvement of rural production and social welfare over  
time (Caffaro et al., 2021; Galdino et al., 2013; Kangogo et al., 2021).  
However, in a certain way, these meanings are absorbed by the awareness that decisions  
have repercussions on society; therefore, the actors’ role as agents of social change is recognized  
(
Wang & Strong, 1996). Thus, the studies developed in recent years in the organizational field,  
based on the theory of planned behavior as an extension of the theory of reasoned action (Ajzen,  
991), have focused on categories where the study of behavior is analyzed from the psychological  
1
factors that influence decision-making within rural and agricultural communities; it is studied  
thinking about the implementation of new technologies for rural projects; and finally on social  
behavior, which leads to the productive development of communities, (Caffaro et al., 2020;  
Caffaro et al.,2021; Chatterjeea et al., 2020; Alavion & Taghdisi, 2020; Bouichou et al., 2021;  
Galdino et al., 2013), among others., and thus strengthen social trust, understood as that trust in  
the unknown, to be able according to Schumacher, as cited in Martin, (2020) to restore a proper  
balance between city and rural life, which is, perhaps, the most significant task that man has today.  
For all this, it can be said that recent publications and articles expose more holistic models,  
which seek to recognize the different conscious and unconscious factors that affect decision-  
making, such as the works of Fang et al. (2020), identify the need for practices that allow  
improvement in the processes for the strengthening of agriculture, as in the research of Abu-Bakar,  
et al., (2020); and Adnan et al., (2019) and, detect a dynamic way to improve in agricultural  
production processes, as in the studies of Alavion & Taghdisi, (2020); and Bouichou, et al., (2021)  
Therefore, the following question arises: How can the literature on the theory of planned  
behavior be characterized in terms of theories, methods, and findings on rural and agricultural  
productive development? Thus, the article presents, in a panoramic way, a systematic review of  
the literature on planned behavior in the framework of agricultural and rural projects, using  
publications from indexed journals categorized Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 according to the Scimago  
Journal ranking. The method adopted was the literature review proposed by Cronin, Ryan, and  
Coughlan (2008).  
Material and methods  
The development of the systematic literature review was focused on processing, ordering,  
and examining information from different studies to identify and evaluate the effectiveness and to  
broaden research perspectives. Thus, the following is a detailed description of how the article was  
developed.  
To begin with the exploration, the author Cronin et al. (2008), which argues that "it is better  
to start with a specific topic and, if necessary, broaden the scope of the review as it progresses" (p.  
3
9), was taken into account, therefore, at the first moment, the research begins to inquire about  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
53  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
rural projects and planned behavior, which yields several results, but not enough for the research  
analysis. Therefore, it is necessary to continue the search in a foreign language, the term "rural  
project" being delimited to the behavior of agricultural and rural productive development, allowing  
a broader spectrum of study. As a second search descriptor, the combination of "rural project" and  
"
Theory of Planned Behavior" was used, focusing and directing the topic of study even more.  
To avoid dispersion in the results (Cronin et al., 2008), the research was directed towards  
behavior, productive agricultural development, rural project, and development Project in the  
primary databases with academic and scientific rigor, such as ScienceDirect, ISI - Web of Science,  
Springer, Emerald, and Scopus, entering and adjusting the search parameters to economic,  
administrative and social science journals. In addition, the information was filtered mainly for  
titles and abstracts of articles published in the last five years, the last two years being the ones that  
contributed the most to these topics.  
The initial literature result yielded 660 articles located in different scientific databases, a  
selection of scientific articles duly validated according to (Podsakoff et al., 2005) was made,  
including search terms such as the theory of planned behavior and social capital in addition to  
those mentioned above. After this first exclusion, 115 articles were retained, to which a filter  
related to rural and agricultural development was applied, keeping 64 scientific articles published  
in Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 journals, which were rigorously validated in Scimago Journal and Country  
Rank. In that order, the respective individual analysis was made, considering points such as  
objectives, scope, similarities, type of study, type of analysis, discussions, and conclusions to  
finally complete the study with the content analysis and systematization of the 64 articles in the  
NVivo software, showing interest in articles related to behavior for productive rural development.  
Results and Discussion  
Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)  
According to TPB, people's important behaviors are intentional. Although external and  
personal constraints make it difficult to act, the immediate determinant of the behavior is the  
person's intention to perform that behavior (Nuttavuthisit & Thøgersen, 2017). Therefore, TPB is  
an adequate behavioral theory to explain the intentions and behaviors of individuals (Sun, &  
Linton, 2018), as it can be predicted with considerable accuracy based on evidence that within the  
variables of analysis, there are items such as attitudes toward behavior (ATT), subjective norms  
regarding behavior (SN), and perceived control over behavior (PBC) (Sussman & Gifford, 2019;  
Colqui & Palomino, 2021; Emekci, 2019; Tomás, 2001; Durán et al., 2007; Miranda & Briley,  
2
021; Sanz et al., 2014 and Choque, 2020). That is, intentions are supposed to capture the  
motivational factors that influence behavior; they indicate how much people are willing to try and  
strive to perform the behavior. As a rule, the stronger the intention to engage in a behavior, the  
more likely it should be to perform. (Ajzen, 1991, p. 181; Emekci, 2019).  
To better understand these terms, attitude should be understood as a perception that  
describes a psychosomatic pathway of evaluating an exact thing with kindness or disrepute  
(Alavion & Taghdisi, 2020; Giampietri et al., 2018; Lanza et al., 2021; Mohammadinezhad &  
Ahmadvand, 2020; Ranjbar et al., 2021; Senger et al., 2017; Tóth et al., 2020; Abu-Bakar et al.,  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
54  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
2
020; Krishnadas & Renganathan, 2021; Pérez & Egea, 2019). That is, attitude toward the  
behavior refers to the degree to which the person has a favorable or unfavorable evaluation of the  
behavior in question (Ajzen, 1991).  
The other term to understand is subjective norms, meaning that some critical people think  
the individual should engage in a specific behavior. The individual's inspiration complies with  
their thinking (Ajzen & Fishben, 1980). That is, the second predictor is a social factor called  
subjective norm and refers to the perceived social pressure to perform or not perform the behavior  
(Ajzen, 1991; Sharahiley, 2020), where the family environment is a social pressure that directly  
influences the intention to undertake (Moriano, Palací, & Morales, 2006). The third construct that  
can influence intention is perceived control, which relates to an individual's perception of the  
degree of ease and difficulties in performing such productive behavior (Abadi et al., 2020; Chin et  
al., 2016; Mohammadinezhad & Ahmadvand, 2020; Nguyen et al., 2021; Rezaei et al., 2020;  
Sarkar et al., 2022; Was et al., 2021; Xiao et al., 2020). The reason why these variables have  
allowed TPB to be used in numerous studies as mentioned (Adnan et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020;  
Chatterjeea et al., 2020; Kumar & Das, 2019; Ranjbar et al., 2021; Shen & Shen, 2020; Wanga et  
al., 2021; Xiao et al., 2020; Agovino et al., 2017), focused on productive behavior and value  
creation.  
The behavior of rural development  
Behavior for rural development starts from the basis of the individual in society,  
approaching the behavioral problem from the perspective of the "number," to put it colloquially.  
Thus, it is usually conceived that an individual behavior becomes social when one of two criteria  
is met: first, that the individual is part of a relatively stable group over time or, second, that it is an  
interaction between two individuals, whether in the context of a group (Ribes et al., 2008). Thus,  
change in societies should be understood as social development as a process of local or rural  
change that operates in the context of an inclusive democracy or through an inclusive  
modernization in which all social, state, and private sector actors participate, where peasant  
organizations and certain NGOs have to assume leading roles (Machado, 1991, p. 179); it should  
also be mentioned that rural development should be observed from various dimensions that can  
affect the behavior of the individual and the context in which decisions are made.  
In an environment of rural projects for community development, behavior starts from the  
responsibility of governments to support and protect the knowledge and know-how of the  
countryside as an essential part of their entrepreneurial spirit, in which case, crucial activities are  
identified, allowing them to represent a new and valuable development perspective focused on  
dialogue and communication as sustainable tools for their projects. In this sense, behavior is  
influenced by positive synergies that establish new balances of well-being in the community,  
which drives the rural and social enterprise to be more competitive, promoting positive impacts on  
their environment and providing protection of human dignity (Annandale et al., 2021; Boadu et  
al., 2020; Trupp et al., 2021).  
Therefore, the concept of rural development for the purposes of this document is  
understood, according to Crespo (2011), as a "set of concrete activities aimed at achieving one or  
more objectives, to respond to the needs, aspirations, and potential of the communities" (p.89),  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
55  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
also, through these projects, to advance in the construction of a better society that consolidates  
values of the common good and healthy and productive coexistence. Therefore, it intends to  
intervene in concrete reality and contribute, according to Almaguer et al. (2021), to the  
"
development of the territory/s and community/s where it acts, and impact on the quality of life of  
the population, enhancing the capacities of the participating groups and actors and taking  
advantage of their own resources and potentialities in the solution of the problems posed" (439).  
In this sense, it is a process of growth and structural change of the local economy, in which at least  
the economic, sociocultural, political, and administrative dimensions can be identified, in which  
case the initiatives create a local environment favorable to production and promote development  
(Aghón et al., 2001)becoming "a methodical tool to develop works that allow contributing to  
the integral transformation" (Romero & Zabala, 2019, p.159).  
Overview of publications  
In the first instance, Figure 1 shows the distribution of the articles consulted between 2008  
and 2022, evidencing a continuous evolution in recent years. In such a way, it can be seen how the  
interest in this topic takes more strength and research relevance.  
Figure 1  
Articles consulted by year of publication  
2
2
1
1
5
0
5
0
5
0
2
0
1
5
1
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
2
008 2009 2010 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022  
Source: Own elaboration.  
Likewise, international scientific journals were consulted, focusing on topics associated  
with development behavior, productive development decisions, rural behavior, and rural, agro-  
industrial, and territorial projects. Table 1 shows the grouping of journals by category according  
to Scimago Journal and Country Rank, where the journals located in the Q1 category represent  
8
4%, highlighting the journal Land Use Policy with a total of 6 articles, equivalent to 11% of the  
articles consulted, followed by the journals Journal of Cleaner Production and Sustainability with  
five articles each, equivalent to 18% of the total number of articles consulted. Likewise, five  
journals were consulted whose category is located in Q2, with a participation of 11%, highlighting  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
56  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
The European Journal of Development Research with two articles, equivalent to 2% of the total  
articles. Finally, one journal in category Q3 and two in category Q4 were consulted, whose  
participation gives 5% of the total number of publications consulted.  
Table 1  
Classification of journals consulted  
Name of the Magazine  
Quantity Name of the Magazine  
Items  
Quantity  
Items  
Q1 Scimago ranked journal  
Agricultura Water Management  
Journal of Entrepreneurship in  
Emerging Economies  
Q1 Scimago ranked journal  
1
1
Science of the Total Environment  
Sustainable Energy Technologies and  
Assessments  
1
1
Agronomy  
2
1
1
1
1
Toursm Review  
1
1
2
1
2
Aibi revista de investigación  
Bio-based and Applied Economics  
Biomas and Bioenergy  
Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy  
Computers and Electronics in  
Agriculture  
Trends in Food Science & Technology  
Food Quality and Preference  
Journal of Hydrology  
Livestock Science  
1
2
Renewable Energy  
2
2
Technological Forecasting & Social  
Change  
Ecological Economics  
Energy & Buildings  
Energy Policy  
1
1
Journal of Environmental Management  
Journal of Rural Studies  
3
3
Environment, Development and  
Sustainability  
Environmental Science and Policy  
2
1
1
Journal of Cleaner Production  
5
Q2 Scimago ranked journal  
International Journal of Social  
Economics  
Journal of Agricultural Science and  
Technology  
Food Control  
1
1
Food Quality and Preference  
2
Journal of Environmental Planning  
and Management  
Habitat International  
Journal of Asian Finance, Economics  
and Business  
Journal of Enterprising Communities  
The European Journal of Development  
Research  
1
1
1
1
1
2
Heliyon  
Information Processing in  
Agriculture  
1
Q3 Scimago ranked journal  
Agricultural Systems  
1
1
Water Science and Technology  
Q4 Scimago ranked journal  
IOP Conference Series: Earth and  
Envirommental Science  
1
Global Ecology and Conservation  
International Journal of  
Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research  
Journal of Safety Research  
Land Use Policy  
2
1
1
1
3
Material Today: Proceedings  
Note: Based on the Quartiles created by Scimago Journal and Country Rank 2022.  
With respect to the analysis of the dendogram, the development of agricultural projects  
through the theory of planned behavior has been approached from different fields related to  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
57  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Development Behavior, Rural Behavior, and Productive Development. Three clusters appear,  
whose vertical analysis, from top to bottom, allows us to see the grouping relationships between  
the articles and their similarities with respect to the topics of interest found in relation to  
agricultural projects.  
Figure 2  
Grouping of articles by word similarity  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
58  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
Note: Grouping by relationships and similarities between selected articles, using Nvivo 12  
software.  
About the first cluster, one finds articles whose purpose is to explain Development  
Behavior (see, for example, Abadi et al., 2020; Kangogo et al., 2021); furthermore, these articles  
seek to incorporate the theory of planned behavior (TPB) to capacity development, given that some  
of them such as proactivity is associated with the adoption of intensive practices. Therefore, the  
studies focus on considering the interrelationships between practices and farmers' entrepreneurial  
orientation when designing development interventions while reviewing the enabling environment  
for farmers' entrepreneurship as an indirect way to support adopting appropriate development  
practices.  
The second cluster is characterized by articles illustrating the importance of information  
and communication technologies (ICT) in facilitating rural development and how the intention of  
ICT adoption enables an ideal entrepreneurial environment (Chatterjeea et al., 2020; Kaliyeva et  
al., 2020; Alavion & Taghdisi, 2020). These studies highlight different types of access, such as  
mental, material, skill, and usage, which contribute significantly to ICT adoption among the rural  
population. Such ICT adoption leads to innovation, which drives entrepreneurial orientation to aid  
micro-entrepreneurship. In this sense, it is shown how the motivation of the rural household can  
increase participation in government programs aimed at promoting a rural cooperative culture  
based on various psychological factors, sociodemographic characteristics of the rural household,  
the production structure, the level of information on the cooperative support program, cultural  
aspects, and the proximity of the household to the main market.  
In the third cluster, there are works based on the essential role of agriculture in economic  
development through agricultural mechanization, which allows the use of operational agricultural  
knowledge to minimize energy, and labor costs and increase productivity (Agovino et al., 2017;  
Krishnadas & Renganathan, 2021; Tóth et al., 2020), where the theory of planned behavior (TPB)  
is applied to see how innovation impacts decision-making through the productive and sustainable  
development of agriculture.  
This research also considered the topics studied and their key findings (Table 2). It can be  
seen that the most significant number of studies focus on purchase behavior and purchase intention  
for organic products, where the actual purchase depends on various behavioral factors, among  
which attitude, knowledge, and beliefs stand out.  
Now, the exploration of research articles and various publications on topics related to the  
intention and behavior of developing rural or agricultural projects is considered an essential point  
in the key conclusions (Table 2), where it can be seen that most of the publications are framed in  
the identification of the reasons that persuade the agricultural community in making decisions; The  
first and most notorious category refers to the development behavior according to the intentions or  
decisions adopted in the community at the time of making a decision, the second refers to rural  
behavior, and the last one refers to productive development where social behavior is analyzed in  
terms of the capacity to implement and put into practice new processes and strategies. And  
strategies.  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
59  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Table 2  
Analysis topics  
Subject  
Main conclusions  
Study  
Abadi (2019); Abadi, et al. (2020); Ahmmadi, et  
al. (2021); Aliabadi, et al. (2020); Beer &  
Theuvsen (2019); Bezaa, et al. (2018); Chin, et  
Based on the theory of planned behavior, and with the  
aim of implementing actions and improving public  
policies that, in some cases, have not generated the  
expected impact, we seek to identify the different  
conscious and unconscious psychological factors that  
influence and affect the mentality and will of farmers  
and consumers in various parts of Europe and Asia  
when adopting or implementing new pro-  
environmental techniques in agriculture. These  
techniques can generate a different dynamic in terms of  
cost reduction, as well as the reduction of carbon  
emissions, and at the same time, help to innovate and  
diversify the development of agriculture, covering a  
diversity of crops throughout the different regions.  
al. (2016); Fang, et al. (2021);  
Ghaniana, et  
al. (2020); Ghoochani, et al. (2018); Kangogo, et  
al. (2021); Landmann, et al. (2020); Lanza, et al.  
(
(
(
(
(
2021); Menozzi, et al. (2014); Moghadam, et al.  
2020); Mohammadinezhad Ahmadvand  
2020); Mwalupaso, et al. (2019); Nettle, et al.  
2021); Nguyen, et al. (2021); Pérez & Egea  
2019); Ranjbar, et al. (2021); Rezaei &  
&
Ghofranfarid (2018); Rezaei, et al. (2020);  
Rezaei, et al. (2018); Safa & Saghinsara  
(
(
2020); Sarkar, et al. (2022); Senger, et al.  
2017); Shen & Shen (2020); Van et al. (2016);  
Villamayor, et al. (2019); Wang , et al. (2020);  
Wang (2021); Was, et al. (2021); Xiao, et al.  
(
2020); Yaghoubi, et al. (2019); Yazdanpanah, et  
al. (2021).  
Projects for the implementation of new ICT  
telecommunications  
technologies  
within  
the  
agricultural community in Europe and Asia, which seek Abu-Bakar, et al. (2020); Adnan, et al. (2019);  
with their use to contribute to the improvement of the Alonso & Krajsic (2015); Caffaro, et al. (2020);  
most used practices in agricultural processes, as well as Caffaro, et al. (2021); Chatterjeea, et al. (2020);  
the training of farmers for the promotion of interactive Kumar & Das (2019); Ness, et al. (2010); Omulo  
learning with actions that can be used in the day to day & Kumeh (2020); Saengavut & Jirasatthumb  
of the crops, so that in this way they can obtain more (2021); Sedeh et al, (2020); Sherrington, et al.  
significant benefits in production and turn to contribute (2008); Valliere (2017); Zhou, et al. (2016).  
to improvements in the implementation of eco-friendly  
processes.  
In the spirit of implementing agricultural sustainability, Agovino, et al. (2017); Alavion & Taghdisi  
we study social behavior in developing countries on (2020); Bouichou, et al. (2021); Galdino, et al.  
issues related to the adoption and implementation of (2013); Giampietri, et al. (2018); Jiang, et al.  
agricultural development models, which are climate (2018); Kaliyeva, et al. (2020); Kaufmann, et al.  
adaptable, as well as security models and, in general, (2009); Krishnadas & Renganathan (2021);  
all types of models that allow farmers to adapt Senger, et al. (2016); Tóth, et al. (2020); Wang,  
effectively, to ensure improved crop production and et al. (2019); Wanga, et al. (2021); Yu & Hui  
welfare over time.  
(2019).  
Note: The table presents the grouping of general conclusions by thematic axis associated with the  
planned behavior.  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
60  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
Types of study and type of analysis  
Analyzing the typology of the articles concerning the type of study carried out (Table 3), it  
was found that the theoretical studies found accounted for 9.3% of the total number of articles, and  
the remaining 90.7% was equivalent to 58 empirical papers, which were analyzed with quantitative  
approaches, in which quantitative statistical and econometric techniques are applied, such as  
structural equations or EQS, descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, correlations, confirmatory  
factor analysis, logistic, linear and multiple regressions. The analysis is in Table 3. It shows that  
the methodologies used in these studies are inclined to carry out studies with statistical rigor, and  
there needs to be more interest in qualitative and mixed studies.  
Table 3  
Classification of journals consulted  
Type of  
Study  
Type of analysis  
Study  
Systematic literature review Adnan, et al. (2019); Valliere (2017).  
Theoretical  
Wang, et al. (2020); Sherrington, et al. (2008); Omulo & Kumeh  
2020); Kaufmann, et al. (2009).  
Ahmmadi, et al. (2021); Alavion & Taghdisi (2020); Aliabadi, et al.  
Descriptive literature review  
(
(
(
(
2020); Bezaa, et al. (2018); Caffaro, et al. (2020); Caffaro, et al.  
2021); Chatterjeea, et al. (2020); Chin, et al. (2016); Ghaniana, et al.  
2020); Ghoochani, et al. (2018); Giampietri, et al. (2018); Kumar &  
Das (2019); Landmann, et al. (2020); Lanza, et al. (2021); Menozzi,  
et al. (2014); Moghadam, et al. (2020); Mohammadinezhad &  
Ahmadvand (2020); Ness, et al. (2010); Ranjbar, et al. (2021); Rezaei  
Structural  
equations or  
SSE  
&
Ghofranfarid (2018); Rezaei, et al. (2018); Saengavut &  
Jirasatthumb (2021); Sarkar, et al. (2022); Senger, et al. (2017); Shen  
Shen (2020); Tóth, et al. (2020); Wang (2021); Wang, et al. (2019);  
&
Wanga, et al. (2021); Xiao, et al. (2020); Yaghoubi, et al. (2019);  
Yazdanpanah, et al. (2021).  
Agovino, et al. (2017); Alonso & Krajsic (2015); Beer & Theuvsen  
Descriptive  
statistics  
(
(
2019); Fang, et al. (2021); Jiang, et al. (2018); Mwalupaso, et al.  
2019); Yu & Hui (2019).  
Empirical Quantitative  
Bivariate  
analysis  
Kaliyeva, et al. (2020).  
Abu-Bakar, et al. (2020); Galdino, et al. (2013); Kangogo, et al.  
Correlation  
(
2021); Rezaei, et al. (2020); Senger, et al. (2016).  
Linear  
regression  
Confirmatory  
factor analysis  
Logistic  
regression  
Maximum  
likelihood  
Multiple  
Nguyen, et al., (2021); Sedeh et al, (2020).  
Abadi (2019); Safa & Saghinsara (2020).  
Bouichou, et al. (2021); Nettle, et al. (2021); Van et al., (2016); Was,  
et al. (2021); Zhou, et al. (2016).  
Villamayor, et al. (2019).  
Abadi, et al. (2020); Krishnadas & Renganathan (2021); Pérez &  
Egea (2019).  
regression  
analysis  
Note: Main types of studies and analyses used in the articles reviewed.  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
61  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Discussion, implications and future lines of research  
Some theoretical and practical implications were identified about the study, and the  
exploration of literature was carried out on the various articles and research. One conclusion is that  
the theory of planned behavior is adequate to explain rural and agricultural productive  
development behavior because it accurately predicts both intentions and behaviors based on  
determining factors such as attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived controls (Ajzen, 2002;  
Corral, 2003). Therefore, applied research should address these issues openly to promote and  
encourage sustainable behavior (Pires et al., 2014), which points to the approach of social and  
environmental attributes oriented to the collective benefit.  
At this point, it should be noted that psychological variables within rural and agricultural  
communities influence entrepreneurial intention. Clarifying that individualism, attitude, and  
propensity to loyalty are part of the influencing elements of the intention (Lu et al., 2015). In other  
words, most studies focus on understanding aspects of rural and agricultural development  
behavior, especially on entrepreneurship, productive, environmental, and social aspects. This  
implies delving into recent models based on the TPB to analyze the behavior and intention to  
undertake rural and agricultural projects. However, more studies are needed to confirm the results  
and analyze the behavioral models developed in rural and agricultural development.  
Similarly, it is vital to analyze how other variables not considered in the articles analyzed  
modify the intention to undertake or decide to develop a project. The social trust variable could be  
included in these models as a determinant of the intention to undertake rural development projects.  
In some other publications (Lanza et al., 2021; Alavion & Taghdisi, 2020; Ahmmadi et al., 2021;  
Wang et al., 2020), the importance of perceived value concerning the intention to develop a project  
is mentioned since it is related to elements such as quality, risk, and publicity. Therefore, aiming  
at an integrated model that incorporates and validates different variables is essential.  
Thus, it is vital to work on future lines of research that seek to understand the decision  
process to develop projects and, to this end, to resort to behavioral theories based on the TPB that  
facilitate understanding the different variables that affect the development action. Finally, the  
results show how most of the studies have a quantitative or qualitative approach, evidencing the  
need to work on mixed approaches that allow broadening the analysis integrally to understand  
agricultural and rural development behaviors and intentions.  
Conclusions  
Consequently, it is necessary to understand the behavioral dynamics of the populations to  
implement new strategies within the agricultural and rural communities that guarantee, in some  
way, the permanence and improvement of the productive processes about time and efficiency  
within the agricultural productive life cycle; for this, and it is necessary to carry out a management  
that integrates all the actors under a single purpose, that of supporting the company and agricultural  
development, as the basis of the economy of the territory.  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
62  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
It is inferred that the adoption of information and communication technologies (ICT)  
facilitates rural development because they motivate innovation and exacerbate the entrepreneurial  
potential of farmers, added to the motivation of the rural household, participation in government  
programs aimed at promoting rural cooperative culture, where these variables are conducive to  
farmers can approach from home to the primary market, and no less important to evaluate their  
Productive Behavior, through agricultural mechanization, which allows farmers to take advantage  
of operative agricultural knowledge to minimize energy, labor costs and increase productivity,  
where the application of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) is interesting.  
In short, it is understood that the study of behavior and its different methods of analysis are  
intended to contribute to the improvement of standard practices through participatory  
methodological proposals, which lead to reflection on social behavior and the adoption and  
implementation of practical agricultural development models, containing the main focus of  
agriculture, and which in turn propose continuous improvement within this practice. In this  
exercise, reviewing various exogenous variables that influence or may influence decision-making  
within rural projects is essential.  
It is, therefore, necessary to build future lines of research which seek to understand better  
the intentions and actions aimed at rural project implementation and define rural development  
behaviour from a professional, entrepreneurial and ethnographic perspective, in which a broader  
understanding of the factors and variables that influence rural and agricultural development action  
is required. Finally, the results show how most of the studies adopted separate literature reviews,  
and quantitative and qualitative approaches, thus indicating the need for mixed methods to  
understand the behaviours and characteristics of rural development, entrepreneurship and social  
innovation.  
Bibliographic References  
Abadi, B. (2019). How agriculture contributes to reviving the endangered ecosystem of Lake  
Urmia? The case of agricultural systems in northwestern Iran. Journal of Environmental  
Abadi, B., Yadollahi, A., Bybordi, A., & Rahmati, M. (2020). The contribution of diverse  
motivations for adhering to soil conservation initiatives and the role of conservation  
agriculture features in decision-making. Agricultural Systems, 182, 1-11.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102849  
Abu-Bakar, Man, N., Nawi, N., Shah, J., Muhamad, N. & Nor, M. (2020). Factors explaining post  
harvest practices adoption among fruit farmers in Johor. IOP Conference Series: Earth and  
Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Bahruddin, M. A., & Tareq, A. H. (2019). A state-of-the-art review on  
facilitating sustainable agriculture through green fertilizer technology adoption: Assessing  
&
Technology, 86, 439-452.  
Aghón, G., Alburquerque, F., & Cortés, P., (2001). Local economic development and  
decentralization in Latin America: comparative analysis. CEPAL Review, (82), 1-15.  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
63  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Agovino, M., Crociata, A., Quaglione, D., Sacco, P., & Sarra, A. (2017). Good taste tastes good.  
Cultural capital as a determinant of organic food purchase by Italian consumers: Evidence  
Economics,  
141,  
66-75.  
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision  
processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html  
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of  
planned behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665-683.  
Ajzen, I. & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior.  
Prentice-Hall.  
Ahmmadi, P., Rahimian, M., & Movahed, R. G. (2021). Theory of planned behavior to predict  
consumer behavior in using products irrigated with purified wastewater in Iran consumer.  
Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126359  
Alavion, S. J., & Taghdisi, A. (2020). Rural E-marketing in Iran; modeling villagers' intention and  
clustering rural regions. Information Processing in Agriculture, 8(1), 105-133.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2020.02.008  
Aliabadi, V., Gholamrezai, S., & Ataei, P. (2020). Rural people's intention to adopt sustainable  
water management by rainwater harvesting practices: application of TPB and HBM  
models. Water Supply, 20(5), 1847-1861. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.094  
Almaguer T. R., Pérez C. M., & Aguilera G. L. (2021) Project life cycle: Guide for designing and  
COODES,  
9(2)  
431-456.  
Alonso, A. D., & Krajsic, V. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour, micro-growers and  
diversification: an exploratory study. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and  
Places in the Global Economy. 9(2), 94-113. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-09-2014-0018  
Annandale, M., Meadows, J., & Erskine, P., (2021). Indigenous forest livelihoods and bauxite  
mining: A case-study from northern Australia. Journal of Environmental Management,  
2
Beer, L., & Theuvsen, L. (2019). Conventional German farmers' attitudes towards agricultural  
wood and their willingness to plant an alley cropping system as an ecological focus area: a  
cluster  
analysis.  
Biomass  
and  
Bioenergy,  
125,  
63-69.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.04.008  
Beza, E., Reidsma, P., Poortvliet, P. M., Belay, M. M., Bijen, B. S., & Kooistra, L. (2018).  
Exploring farmers' intentions to adopt mobile Short Message Service (SMS) for citizen  
science in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 151, 295-310.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.06.015  
Boadu, E. S., Ile, I., & Oduro, M. Y. (2020). Indigenizing participation for sustainable community-  
based development programmes in Ghana. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 56(7),  
1
Bouichou, E. H., Abdoulaye, T., Allali, K., Bouayad, A., & Fadlaoui, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial  
intention among rural youth in Moroccan Agricultural Cooperatives: the future of rural  
entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 13(16), 9247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169247.  
Caffaro, F., Cremasco, M. M., Roccato, M., & Cavallo, E. (2020). Drivers of farmers' intention to  
adopt technological innovations in Italy: The role of information sources, perceived  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
64  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
usefulness, and perceived ease of use. Journal of Rural Studies, 76, 264-271.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.028  
Caffaro, F., Roccato, M., de Paolis, G., Cremasco, M. M., & Cavallo, E. (2021). Promoting  
farming sustainability: The effects of age, training, history of accidents and social-  
psychological variables on the adoption of on-farm safety behaviors. Journal of Safety  
Research, 80, 371-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.12.018  
Chatterjee, S., Gupta, S. D., & Upadhyay, P. (2020). Technology adoption and entrepreneurial  
orientation for rural women: Evidence from India. Technological Forecasting and Social  
Change, 160, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120236  
Chin, H. C., Choong, W. W., Alwi, S. R. W., & Mohammed, A. H. (2016). Using Theory of  
Planned Behaviour to explore oil palm smallholder planters' intention to supply oil palm  
residues.  
Journal  
of  
Cleaner  
Production,  
126,  
428-439.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.042  
Choque, A. (2020). Explaining the intention and use of individual shared mobility in Barcelona  
by using the theory of planned behavior. [Master’s Thesis, Universitat de Barcelona,  
España]. http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/handle/2445/173226  
Colqui, L. O. R., & Palomino, C. R. (2021). Variables of the theory of extended planned behavior  
in the prediction-explanation of oral hygiene behavior in university students in the city of  
Cajamarca [Doctoral Thesis, Universidad Privada Antonio Guillermo Urrelo, Perú].  
http://65.111.187.205/handle/UPAGU/1876  
Corral, C. (2003). Sustainable production and consumption systems-cooperation for change:  
assessing and simulating the willingness of the firm to adopt/develop cleaner technologies.  
The case of the In-Bond industry in northern Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production,  
1
1(4), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00063-X  
Crespo, M. (2015). Guía de diseño de proyectos sociales comunitarios bajo el enfoque del marco  
lógico. Caracas, Venezuela.  
https://planificacionsocialunsj.files.wordpress.com/2017/10/guia-de-proyectos-sociales-  
crespo.pdf  
Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step  
approach.  
https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2008.17.1.28059  
Durán, M., Alzate, M., López, W., & Sabucedo, J. (2007). Emotions and pro-environmental  
behaviors. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 39(2), 287-296.  
British  
Journal  
of  
Nursing,  
17(1),  
38-43.  
http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-05342007000200006  
Emekci, S. (2019). Green consumption behaviours of consumers within the scope of TPB. Journal  
of Consumer Marketing, 36(3), 410-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-05-2018-2694  
Fang, L., Hu, R., Mao, H., & Chen, S. (2021). How crop insurance influences agricultural green  
total factor productivity: Evidence from Chinese farmers. Journal of Cleaner Production,  
3
21, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128977  
Galdino, C. G., Dorward, P., & Rehman, T. (2013). Factors influencing adoption of improved  
grassland management by small-scale dairy farmers in central Mexico and the implications  
for future research on smallholder adoption in developing countries. Livestock Science,  
1
52(2-3), 228-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2012.10.007  
García Palacios, E., & Moyano Estrada, E. (2020). Governance and territorial development. Rural  
development agencies in the implementation of the Mexican PESA program. Ager:  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
65  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Journal of Depopulation and Rural Development Studies, 28, 185-215.  
Ghanian, M., Ghoochani, O. M., Dehghanpour, M., Taqipour, M., Taheri, F., & Cotton, M. (2020).  
Understanding farmers' climate adaptation intention in Iran: A protection-motivation  
extended  
model.  
Land  
Use  
Policy,  
94,  
1-13.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104553  
Ghoochani, O., Ghanian, M., Baradaran, M., Alimirzaei, E., & Azadi, H. (2018). Behavioral  
intentions toward genetically modified crops in Southwest Iran: a multi-stakeholder  
analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 233-253.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9879-3  
Giampietri, E., Verneau, F., Del Giudice, T., Carfora, V., & Finco, A. (2018). A Theory of Planned  
behaviour perspective for investigating the role of trust in consumer purchasing decision  
related to short food supply chains. Food Quality and Preference, 64, 160-166.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.09.012  
Jiang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, H.H., Zhang, L., & He, K. (2018). The impact of psychological factors  
on farmers' intentions to reuse agricultural biomass waste for carbon emission abatement.  
Journal  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.040  
Kaliyeva, S., Areal, F., & Gadanakis, Y. (2020). Attitudes of Kazakh rural households towards  
joining and creating cooperatives. Agriculture, 10(11), 1-20.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10110568  
of  
Cleaner  
Production,  
189,  
797-804.  
Kangogo, D., Dentoni, D., & Bijman, J. (2021). Adoption of climate-smart agriculture among  
smallholder farmers: Does farmer entrepreneurship matter? Land Use Policy, 109, 1-13.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105666  
Kaufmann, P., Stagl, S., & Franks, D. W. (2009). Simulating the diffusion of organic farming  
practices in two New EU Member States. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2580-2593.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.04.001  
Krishnadas, R., & Renganathan, R. (2021). Examining the theory of planned behaviour in  
determining the farmers intention to purchase tractors. Materials Today: Proceedings.  
Tamil Nadu, India. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.139  
Kumar, S., & Das, S. (2019). An extended model of theory of planned behaviour: Entrepreneurial  
intention, regional institutional infrastructure and perceived gender discrimination in India.  
Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. 11(3), 369-391.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-09-2018-0089  
Landmann, D., Lagerkvist, C. J., & Otter, V. (2020). Determinants of small-scale farmers' intention  
to use smartphones for generating agricultural knowledge in developing countries:  
Evidence from rural India. The European Journal of Development Research, 33(6), 1435-  
1
454. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00284-x.  
Lanza, G. M. Engler, A., & Wollni, M. (2021). Planned behavior and social capital: understanding  
farmers' behavior toward pressurized irrigation technologies. Agricultural Water  
Management, 243, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106524  
Lu, L., Chang, H., & Chang, A. (2015). Consumer personality and green buying intention: The  
mediating role of consumer ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 205-219.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2024-4  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
66  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
Machado, A. (1991). Neoliberal policies and rural development. Seminario Internacional, Rural  
development  
and  
economic  
openness.  
Bogota,  
Colombia.  
http://repiica.iica.int/docs/B1129e/B1129e.pdf  
Martín, J. C. (2000). Local development for a new rural development. In Anales de geografía de  
la Universidad Complutense 20, 85-100.  
Menozzi, D., Fioravanzi, M., & Donati, M. (2014). Farmer's motivation to adopt sustainable  
agricultural practices. Bio-based and Applied Economics, 4(2), 125-147.  
https://doi.org/10.13128/BAE-14776  
Miranda, D., & Briley, D. (2021). Digital tourist: variables defining their purchase behavior.  
Investigaciones Turísticas, 21, 1-21. http://rua.ua.es/dspace/handle/10045/112195  
Moghadam, M., Raheli, H., Zarifian, S., & Yazdanpanah, M. (2020). The power of the health  
belief model (HBM) to predict water demand management: A case study of farmers' water  
conservation in Iran. Journal of Environmental Management, 263, 1-7.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110388  
Mohammadinezhad, S., & Ahmadvand, M. (2020). Modeling the internal processes of farmers'  
water conflicts in arid and semi-arid regions: Extending the theory of planned behavior.  
Journal of Hydrology, 580, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124241  
Moraima Romero, D., & Aldana Zavala, J. J. (2019). Community Projects in the process of Social  
University.  
CIENCIAMATRIA,  
5(9),  
151-167.  
Moriano, J., Palací, F. & Morales, J. (2006). The psychosocial profile of the university  
entrepreneur. Revista Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 2(1), 75-99.  
Mwalupaso, G. E., Wang, S., Xu, Z., & Tian, X. (2019). Towards auspicious agricultural  
informatization-Implication of Farmers' behavioral intention apropos of mobile phone use  
in agriculture. Sustainability, 11(22), 6282. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226282.  
Ness, M. R., Ness, M., Brennan, M., Oughton, E., Ritson, C., & Ruto, E. (2010). Modelling  
consumer behavioural intentions towards food with implications for marketing quality low-  
input and organic food. Food Quality and Preference, 21(1), 100-111.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.012  
Nettle, R., Morton, J. M., McDonald, N., Suryana, M., Birch, D., Nyengo, K., ... & Reichelt, N.  
(
2021). Factors associated with farmers' use of fee-for-service advisors in a privatized  
agricultural extension system. Land Use Policy, 104, 1-17.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105360  
Nguyen, T. D., Hoang, H. G., & Sen, L. T. H. (2021). Understanding farmers' behavior regarding  
organic rice production in Vietnam. Organic Agriculture, 12, 63-73.  
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-021-00380-0  
Nuttavuthisit, K., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). The importance of consumer trust for the emergence of  
a market for green products: The case of organic food. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(2),  
3
23-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2690-5  
Omulo, G., & Kumeh, E. M. (2020). Farmer-to-farmer digital network as a strategy to strengthen  
agricultural performance in Kenya: A research note on 'Wefarm'platform. Technological  
Forecasting and Social Change, 158, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120120  
Ordoñez Abril, D. Y., Calderon Sotero, J. H., & Padilla Delgado, L. M. (2021). Literature review  
of the theory of planned behavior in the organic purchase decision. National Journal of  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
67  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Pérez, L., & Egea, P. (2019). About intentions to donate for sustainable rural development: An  
exploratory study. Sustainability, 11(3), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030765  
Pires, P., Ribas-Junior, R., Lemos, D., & Filgueiras, A. (2014). Ecocentrism e comportamento:  
revisão da literatura em valores ambientais. Psicologia em Estudo, 19(4), 611-620.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-73722201204  
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005). The influence  
of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26(5),  
4
73-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.454  
Ranjbar, B., Naeimi, A., & Badsar, M. (2021). Designing an integrated model for strawberry  
growers' behavior toward implementation of good agricultural practices in Iran.  
Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 1-21. https://bit.ly/3QYUpLE  
Rezaei, R., & Ghofranfarid, M. (2018). Rural households' renewable energy usage intention in  
Iran: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Renewable Energy,  
1
22, 382-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.011  
Rezaei, R., Safa, L., & Ganjkhanloo, M. M. (2020). Understanding farmers' ecological  
conservation behavior regarding the use of integrated pest management-an application of  
the technology acceptance model. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22, 1-18.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00941  
Rezaei, R., Mianaji, S., & Ganjloo, A. (2018). Factors affecting farmers' intention to engage in on-  
farm food safety practices in Iran: Extending the theory of planned behavior. Journal of  
Rural Studies, 60, 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.04.005  
Ribes-Iñesta, E., Rangel, N. E., & López-Valadéz, F. (2008). Theoretical analysis of the functional  
dimensions of social behavior. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25(1), 45-57.  
https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2430/243016300003.pdf  
Saengavut, V., & Jirasatthumb, N. (2021). Smallholder decision-making process in technology  
adoption intention: implications for Dipterocarpus alatus in Northeastern Thailand.  
Heliyon, 7(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06633  
Safa, L., & Mohammadian S.V. (2020). Understanding rural people's engagement in pro-  
environmental behaviors: An integrated conceptual framework. Journal of Agricultural  
Science  
and  
Technology,  
22(5),  
1205-1217.  
https://jast.modares.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-48500-2&slc_lang=en&sid=23  
Sanz-Blas, S., Ruiz-Mafé, C., Pérez, I., & Hernández-Ortega, B. (2014). Influence of culture on  
the online purchase behavior of tourism products. The case of Spain and Mexico. Innovar,  
2
4(54), 153-165. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v24n54.46656  
Sarkar, A., Wang, H., Rahman, A., Qian, L., & Memon, W.H. (2022). Evaluating the roles of the  
farmer's cooperative for fostering environmentally friendly production technologies-a case  
of kiwi-fruit farmers in Meixian, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 301, 1-  
1
1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113858  
Sedeh, A. A., Abootorabi, H., & Zhang, J. (2020). National social capital, perceived  
entrepreneurial ability and entrepreneurial intentions. International Journal of  
Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 27(2), 334-355. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-  
2
019-0616  
Senger, I., Rossi Borges, J. A., & Dessimon Machado, J. A. (2016). Using structural equation  
modeling to identify the psychological factors influencing dairy farmers' intention to  
diversify  
agricultural  
production.  
Livestock  
science,  
203,  
97-105.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.07.009  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
68  
Rural and agricultural productive development behavior. A literature review from the theory of planned behavior  
between 2008 and 2022  
Senger, I., Rossi Borges, J. A., & Dessimon Machado, J. A. (2017). Using the theory of planned  
behavior to understand the intention of small farmers in diversifying their agricultural  
production.  
Journal  
of  
Rural  
Studies,  
49,  
32-40.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.10.006  
Sharahiley, S. M. (2020). Examining entrepreneurial intention of the Saudi Arabia's University  
students: Analyzing alternative integrated research model of TPB and EEM. Global  
Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-  
0
19-00231-8  
Shen, K., & Shen, H. (2020). Chinese traditional village residents' behavioural intention to support  
tourism: an extended model of the theory of planned behaviour. Tourism Review. 76(2),  
4
39-459. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-11-2019-0451  
Sherrington, C., Bartley, J., & Moran, D. (2008). Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of  
perennial energy crops in the UK. Energy Policy, 36(7), 2504-2512.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.03.004  
Sun, H., Teh, P-L., & Linton, J. D. (2018). Impact of environmental knowledge and product quality  
on student attitude toward products with recycled/remanufactured content: Implications for  
environmental education and green manufacturing. Business Strategy and the  
Environment, 27(7), 935-945. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2043  
Sussman, R., & Gifford, R. (2019). Causality in the theory of planned behavior. Personality and  
Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(6), 920-933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218801363  
Tomás, M. C. (2001). A first application of the theory of planned behavior to explain treatment  
dropout by alcohol-dependent individuals. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada:  
Revista de la Federación Española de Asociaciones de Psicología, 54(3), 389-405.  
Tóth, J., Migliore, G., Balogh, J. M., & Rizzo, G. (2020). Exploring innovation adoption behavior  
for sustainable development: the case of hungarian food sector. Agronomy, 10(4), 1-12.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040612  
Trupp, A., Matatolu, I. & Movono, A. (2021), Gender and Benefit-Sharing in Indigenous Tourism  
Microentrepreneurship.  
Tourism  
Microentrepreneurship,  
12,  
51-63.  
https://doi.org/10.1108/S2042-144320210000012005  
Valliere, D. (2017). Belief patterns of entrepreneurship: exploring cross-cultural logics.  
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research. 23(2), 1-43.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-12-2015-0297  
Van Hulst, F. J., & Posthumus, H. (2016). Understanding (non-) adoption of conservation  
agriculture in Kenya using the reasoned action approach. Land Use Policy, 56, 303-314.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.002  
Villamayor-Tomas, S., Sagebiel, J., & Olschewski, R. (2019). Bringing the neighbors in: A choice  
experiment on the influence of coordination and social norms on farmers' willingness to  
accept agro-environmental schemes across Europe. Land use policy, 84, 200-215.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.006  
Wang, H., Li, C., Liu, J., & Zhang, S. (2019). Research on Farmers' Willingness of Land Transfer  
Behavior  
Based  
on  
Food  
Security.  
Sustainability,  
11(8),  
1-17.  
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082338  
Wang, F., Wang, S., Cheng, B., & Wang, W. (2021). To inhabit, retain or abandon? Adaptive  
utilization of energy-efficient sunken buildings by rural households in Shanzhou, China.  
Energy and Buildings, 255, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111668  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
69  
Daniel Yiwady Ordoñez-Abril, Nicolas Aragón-Sánchez, José Julián Ríos-Chávez y Robert Rodríguez-Porto  
ISSN 2477-9024. Innova Research Journal (Septiembre-Diciembre, 2023). Vol. N8, No. 3, pp. 51-70  
Wang, R., & Strong, D. (1996). Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers.  
Journal  
of  
Management  
Information  
Systems,  
12(4),  
5-33.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518099.  
Wang, Y., He, K., Zhang, J., & Chang, H. (2020). Environmental knowledge, risk attitude, and  
households' willingness to accept compensation for the application of degradable  
agricultural mulch film: Evidence from rural China. Science of The Total Environment,  
7
44, 113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140616  
Wang, X. (2021). Analysis of influencing mechanism on waste separation behavior in Shanghai.  
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 47, 110.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2021.101479  
Wąs, A., Malak-Rawlikowska, A., Zavalloni, M., Viaggi, D., Kobus, P., & Sulewski, P. (2021).  
In search of factors determining the participation of farmers in agri-environmental  
schemes-Does only money matter in Poland? Land Use Policy, 101, 1-15.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105190  
Xiao, J., Song, Y., & You, H. (2020). Explaining Peasants' Intention and Behavior of Farmland  
Trusteeship in China: Implications for Sustainable Agricultural Production. Sustainability,  
1
2(14), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145748.  
Yaghoubi, J., Yazdanpanah, M., & Komendantova, N. (2019). Iranian agriculture advisors'  
perception and intention toward biofuel: Green way toward energy security, rural  
development and climate change mitigation. Renewable Energy, 130, 452-459.  
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.081  
Yazdanpanah, M., Moghadam, M. T., Zobeidi, T., Turetta, A. P. D., Eufemia, L., & Sieber, S.  
(
2021). What factors contribute to conversion to organic farming? Consideration of the  
Health Belief Model in relation to the uptake of organic farming by Iranian farmers.  
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 65(5), 907-929.  
https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1917348  
Yu, K. H., & Hui, E. C. M. (2019). Pogodzinsk land-use planning, certainty, and flexibility: A  
study of planning control decisions on residential development in Hong Kong. Habitat  
International, 83, 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.11.008  
Zhou, J., Yan, Z., & Li, K. (2016). Understanding farmer cooperatives' self-inspection behavior to  
guarantee agri-product safety in China. Food Control, 59, 320-327.  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.035  
Esta obra se comparte bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución-No Comercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)  
Revista de la Universidad Internacional del Ecuador. URL: https://www.uide.edu.ec/  
70